Topics: Difference between revisions

From phys600
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(29 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[https://www.frankawilczek.com/ Frank Wilczek] on Einstein's productive years:
<pre> “The later part of Einstein’s career-more than half, chronologically, covering thirty years—was devoted to (let’s call it) Theory of Everything physics, and it was essentially fruitless. During Einstein’s great creative period he dealt with much more specific, less grandiose problems. His special theory of relativity came out of worrying about technical difficulties in the electrodynamics of moving bodies. His general theory of relativity came out of worrying about how to make a theory of gravity consistent with special relativity. His pioneering work on Brownian motion and Bose-Einstein statistics came out of worrying about the relationship between fundamental physics and thermodynamics; specifically, about fluctuations. His seminal work on photons came out of thinking about specific, puzzling experimental results, notably the observed spectrum of blackbody radiation.”
</pre>
[https://www.frankawilczek.com/ Frank Wilczek] on Einstein's unproductive years:
<pre> “Why did Einstein loathe the implications of quantum mechanics? This question belongs to psychology more than physics. There was certainly no empirical reason for his distaste-on the contrary, quantum mechanics went from success to brilliant success. Einstein apparently just didn’t like the way probability enters into the laws of quantum theory, and he may have sensed difficulties in reconciling quantum theory with his baby, relativity. A normal scientific reaction would have been to respect the overwhelming success of what people were doing in quantum theory, assimilate that work, and try to tinker with it (maybe hoping to remove the probabilities) or build on it (to include relativity). In fact, we know that great results were there to be had along those directions, such as the Bell inequalities and the Dirac equation. But instead of trying to tinker or build, Einstein went into denial.”
</pre>
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Uhlenbeck George Uhlenbeck] describes advising by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Ehrenfest Paul Ehrenfest]:
<pre> “He worked essentially always only with one student, and that practically every afternoon during the week. He discussed with him either the problem on which he was working or recent papers in the literature which he wanted to understand in detail. It went fast, and at the end of the afternoon one was dead tired.  ... The wonder was that after a while the tiredness disappeared, and after a year one worked almost as equals.”
</pre>
==Astronomy & Astrophysics==
==Astronomy & Astrophysics==
* [http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102014-022036 Ground and space based gamma-ray astronomy] (Holder)
* [http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102014-022036 Ground and space based gamma-ray astronomy] (Holder)
Line 17: Line 29:
*[http://science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6234/498 The quantum halo state of the helium trimer] (Szalewicz)
*[http://science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6234/498 The quantum halo state of the helium trimer] (Szalewicz)
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2711635 Casimir forces: Still surprising after 60 years] (Szalewicz)
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2711635 Casimir forces: Still surprising after 60 years] (Szalewicz)
*[https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/723/1/012043 Atomic clocks and dark-matter signatures] (Safronova)
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2313 Quantum information with Rydberg atoms] (Safronova)
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2313 Quantum information with Rydberg atoms] (Safronova)
*[https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 Nonadiabatic mixed quantum-classical dynamics] (Kananenka)
*[https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 Nonadiabatic mixed quantum-classical dynamics] (Kananenka)
*[https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.physchem.012809.103321 Range-separated density functional theory] (Kananenka)
*[https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.1640 Quantum optomechanics] (Singh at ECE)
*[https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.1640 Quantum optomechanics] (Singh at ECE)
*[https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.2596 Squeezing quantum noise] (Singh at ECE)
*[https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.2596 Squeezing quantum noise] (Singh at ECE)
Line 42: Line 56:
*[http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1021/cr5001892 Understanding photocatalysis: Mechanisms and materials] (Shah)
*[http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1021/cr5001892 Understanding photocatalysis: Mechanisms and materials] (Shah)
*[http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v11/n3/full/nmat3263.html Photonic design principles for ultrahigh-efficiency photovoltaics] (Birkmire)
*[http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v11/n3/full/nmat3263.html Photonic design principles for ultrahigh-efficiency photovoltaics] (Birkmire)
*[http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v9/n10/full/nnano.2014.214.html Graphene spintronics] (Nikolic)
*[https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.92.021003 Spintronics in graphene and other 2D materials] (Nikolic)
*[https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.4164 Machine learning meets quantum physics] (Nikolic)
*[http://science.sciencemag.org/content/353/6298/aac9439 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures] (Nikolic)
*[http://science.sciencemag.org/content/353/6298/aac9439 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures] (Nikolic)
*[https://science.sciencemag.org/content/367/6475/eaay0668 Quantum spin liquids] (Nikolic)
*[https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.4164 Machine learning meets quantum physics] (Kananenka)
*[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41570-017-0109 Nuclear quantum effects in condensed-phase] (Kananenka)
*[http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/article/63/1/10.1063/1.3293411 Quantum spin Hall effect and topological insulators] (Law at MSEG)
*[http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/article/63/1/10.1063/1.3293411 Quantum spin Hall effect and topological insulators] (Law at MSEG)
*[https://www.nature.com/articles/nphoton.2012.262 Graphene plasmonics] (Law at MSEG)  
*[https://www.nature.com/articles/nphoton.2012.262 Graphene plasmonics] (Law at MSEG)  
*[https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/PT.3.2549 Defect center qubits: Computing and sensing applications] (Singh at ECE)
*[https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/PT.3.2549 Defect center qubits: Computing and sensing applications] (Ku experiment; Singh at ECE theory)


==Elementary Particles, Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology==
==Elementary Particles, Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology==
* [http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140534 Neutrino mass and new physics] (Barr)
* [http://www.annualreviews.org.udel.idm.oclc.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102313-025632 Status and implications of beyond-the-Standard-Model searches at the LHC] (Barr)
* [http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00159-013-0070-7 The origin of galactic cosmic rays] (Gaisser)
* [http://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.907 Utrahigh energy cosmic rays] (Stanev)
* [http://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.907 Utrahigh energy cosmic rays] (Stanev)
* [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641016300758?via%3Dihub Radio detection of high-energy cosmic particles] (Schroeder)
* [http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00159-013-0070-7 The origin of galactic cosmic rays] (Schroeder)
* [http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/81/8/10.1063/1.3480478 Ice cube: An instrument for neutrino astronomy] (Seckel)
* [http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/81/8/10.1063/1.3480478 Ice cube: An instrument for neutrino astronomy] (Seckel)
* [http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140534 Neutrino mass and new physics] (Seckel)
* [http://physics.aps.org/gravitational-waves Discovery of gravitational waves] (Shafi)
* [http://physics.aps.org/gravitational-waves Discovery of gravitational waves] (Shafi)
* [http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.nucl.54.070103.181232 Experimental cosmology with cosmic microwave background]  (Shafi)
* [http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.nucl.54.070103.181232 Experimental cosmology with cosmic microwave background]  (Shafi)
* [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641016300758?via%3Dihub Radio detection of high-energy cosmic particles] (Schroeder)
* [http://www.annualreviews.org.udel.idm.oclc.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102313-025632 Status and implications of beyond-the-Standard-Model searches at the LHC] (Shafi)


==Space and Plasma Physics==
==Space and Plasma Physics==

Latest revision as of 17:08, 1 September 2022

Frank Wilczek on Einstein's productive years:

 “The later part of Einstein’s career-more than half, chronologically, covering thirty years—was devoted to (let’s call it) Theory of Everything physics, and it was essentially fruitless. During Einstein’s great creative period he dealt with much more specific, less grandiose problems. His special theory of relativity came out of worrying about technical difficulties in the electrodynamics of moving bodies. His general theory of relativity came out of worrying about how to make a theory of gravity consistent with special relativity. His pioneering work on Brownian motion and Bose-Einstein statistics came out of worrying about the relationship between fundamental physics and thermodynamics; specifically, about fluctuations. His seminal work on photons came out of thinking about specific, puzzling experimental results, notably the observed spectrum of blackbody radiation.” 

Frank Wilczek on Einstein's unproductive years:

 “Why did Einstein loathe the implications of quantum mechanics? This question belongs to psychology more than physics. There was certainly no empirical reason for his distaste-on the contrary, quantum mechanics went from success to brilliant success. Einstein apparently just didn’t like the way probability enters into the laws of quantum theory, and he may have sensed difficulties in reconciling quantum theory with his baby, relativity. A normal scientific reaction would have been to respect the overwhelming success of what people were doing in quantum theory, assimilate that work, and try to tinker with it (maybe hoping to remove the probabilities) or build on it (to include relativity). In fact, we know that great results were there to be had along those directions, such as the Bell inequalities and the Dirac equation. But instead of trying to tinker or build, Einstein went into denial.” 

George Uhlenbeck describes advising by Paul Ehrenfest:

 “He worked essentially always only with one student, and that practically every afternoon during the week. He discussed with him either the problem on which he was working or recent papers in the literature which he wanted to understand in detail. It went fast, and at the end of the afternoon one was dead tired.  ... The wonder was that after a while the tiredness disappeared, and after a year one worked almost as equals.” 

Astronomy & Astrophysics

AMO Physics

Biological Physics

Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Physics and Nanophysics

Elementary Particles, Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology

Space and Plasma Physics