Homework Set 1: Difference between revisions

From phys824
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(44 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Problem 1 ==
== Problem 1==
Consider electrons in a toy model of 1D nanowire modeled on a [[Discretization of 1D continuous Hamiltonian|discrete lattice]] of 100 points which are spaced by <math> a=0.2 </math> nm. Hard wall boundary conditions are modeling edges of the wire. Write Python script that constructs the Hamiltonian matrix <math> \mathbf{H} </math> of the dot and the corresponding equilibrium density matrix <math> \boldsymbol{\rho}_\mathrm{eq} = f(\mathbf{H} - \mu\mathbf{I}) </math> where <math> f(x) </math> is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function.


The two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) in semiconductor heterostructures with structural inversion asymmetry in the growth direction (perpendicular to the 2DEG plane) plays an essential role in the pursuit of [http://physics.aps.org/articles/v2/50 "spintronics without magnetism"] since the spin of an electron in nanostructures made of such 2DEGs can be controlled by electrical fields (which can be controlled on much smaller spatial and temporal scales than traditional cumbersome magnetic fields). Such control is made possible by the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) which represent manifestations of relativistic quantum mechanics in solids (enhanced, when compared to corrections in vacuum, by the band structure effects).
:'''(a)''' Plot the energy eigenvalues of the dot Hamiltonian (in eV) as the function of eigenvalue number. Add horizontal line on this plot for the chemical potential <math> \mu=0.25 </math> eV.
 
One of the important SOCs for 2DEGs is the linear Rashba one encoded by the following effective mass Hamiltonian:


<math> \hat{H}  =  \frac{\hat{p}_x^2 + \hat{p}_y^2}{2 m^*} + \frac{\alpha}{\hbar} \left( \hat{p}_y \hat{\sigma}_x  - \hat{p}_x  \hat{\sigma}_y  \right), \ (1) </math>
:'''(b)''' Using the diagonal elements of the equilibrium density matrix <math> \boldsymbol{\rho}_\mathrm{eq} </math>, compute electron density within the dot and make a plot <math> n(x) </math> vs. <math> x </math> at room temperature <math> k_B T =0.025 </math> eV, as well as  at ten times lower temperature <math> k_B T =0.0025 </math> eV. Explain the difference in <math> n(x) </math> as the temperature is increased (at <math> T=0 </math> K one would get a result - probability density for eigenfunctions in an infinite potential well -  familiar from textbook quantum mechanics).


where <math> \alpha </math> measures the strength of the Rashba coupling. Here <math> (\hat{p}_x,\hat{p}_y) </math> is the two-dimensional momentum operator and <math> \hat{\mathbf{\sigma}} = (\hat{\sigma}_x,\hat{\sigma}_y,\hat{\sigma}_z) </math> is the vector of Pauli spin matrices.
:'''(c)''' Add an impurity in the center of the quantum dot (at position <math>x=50</math>), which can be modeled by a large on-site repulsive potential <math> U_{50}=2 </math> eV in your Hamiltonian, as well as two additional impurities at positions positions <math>x=25</math> and  <math>x=75</math>. Recompute the charge density at two different temperatures used in '''(b)''', while exploring different potentials of two "side" impurities.
 
:'''(a)''' Find the expression for the velocity operator <math> \mathbf{v} </math> in Rashba 2DEG.
 
:'''(b)''' Using your result in '''(a)''', construct the expressions for the charge <math> \hat{\mathbf{j}}(\mathbf{r}) </math> and spin  <math> \hat{j}^{S_\beta}_\alpha </math> current operators.


== Problem 2 ==
== Problem 2 ==
 
The dimensionality of a quantum system can be effectively reduced by confining its particles in certain directions. A two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) is produced in semiconductor heterostructures  and is used for the investigation of the quantum Hall effect, creation of semiconductor quantum dots, quantum point contacts, nanowires, etc.
The dimensionality of a system can be reduced by confining the electrons in certain directions. A two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) is produced in semiconductor heterostructures  and is used for the investigation of the quantum Hall effect, creation of semiconductor quantum dots, quantum point contacts, nanowires, etc.


Consider a simplified model of a 2DEG where electron gas (infinite in the x and y directions; you can assume periodic boundary conditions in these directions) is subjected to an external potential <math>V=0</math> for <math> |z| < d/2</math> and <math> V=V_0</math> for <math>|z| > d/2</math>.  
Consider a simplified model of a 2DEG where electron gas (infinite in the x and y directions; you can assume periodic boundary conditions in these directions) is subjected to an external potential <math>V=0</math> for <math> |z| < d/2</math> and <math> V=V_0</math> for <math>|z| > d/2</math>.  


:'''(a)''' What is the density of states (DOS) as a function of energy for <math>V_0 \rightarrow \infty</math>? Discuss what happens at low energies and how DOS behaves in the limit of high energies.  
:'''(a)''' What is the density of states (DOS) as a function of energy for <math>V_0 \rightarrow \infty</math>? Discuss what happens at low energies and how DOS behaves in the limit of high energies.  


:'''(b)''' Assume <math>V_0 \rightarrow \infty</math> and <math> d = 100 \AA</math>. Up to what temperature <math> T </math> can we consider the electrons to be two-dimensional? (HINT: The electrons will behave  two-dimensionally if <math>k_BT</math> is less then the difference between the ground and first excited energy levels in the confining potential along the <math>z</math>-axis.)
:'''(b)''' Assume <math>V_0 \rightarrow \infty</math> and <math> d = 100 \AA</math>. Up to what temperature <math> T </math> can we consider the electrons to be two-dimensional? (HINT: The electrons will behave  two-dimensionally if <math>k_BT</math> is less then the difference between the ground and first excited energy levels in the confining potential along the <math>z</math>-axis.)


:'''(c)''' In real systems we can only produce a finite potential well. This puts a lower limit on the 2DEG thickness <math> d </math> since the ground state must be a bound state in the ''z'' direction with  a clear energy gap up to the first excited state. If we can produce a potential of <math>V_0=100</math> meV and reach a temperature of 20 mK, what is the range of thicknesses <math> d </math> feasible  for the study of such two-dimensional electron gas?


:'''(c)''' In real systems we can only produce a finite potential well. This puts a lower limit on the 2DEG thickness <math> d </math> since the ground state must be a bound state in the ''z'' direction with a clear energy gap up to the first excited state. If we can produce a potential of <math>V_0=100</math> meV and reach a temperature of 20 mK, what is the range of thicknesses <math> d </math> feasible  for the study of such two-dimensional electron gas?
== Problem 3==
Electrons in an one-dimensional nanowire patterned within 2DEG are found to be in the mixed state, which is 25% plane wave with wave vector <math> k_1 </math> and 75% in the plane wave with the wave vector <math> k_2 </math> along the <math> x </math>-axis. This type of state is described by by the density matrix:


REFERENCE: Ihn textbook Chapter 9.
<math> \hat{\rho} = \frac{1}{4} |k_1\rangle \langle k_1| + \frac{3}{4} |k_2\rangle \langle k_2| </math>


== Problem 3 ==
where <math> \langle x|k \rangle=e^{ikx}/\sqrt{L} </math> assuming wire of length <math> L </math> with periodic boundary conditions.
An experimentalist has fabricated a thin film of silver, which is <math> 10^5 </math> nm  wide and <math> 10^5 </math> nm long along the <math> x </math> and <math> y </math> axis, respectively, and has thickness of <math> 0.41 </math> nm in the <math> z</math>-direction. In order to contact the film with electrodes of external circuit, one has to know its Fermi energy and the Fermi energy of electrodes in order to avoid too much charge transfer and the ensuing contact resistance.


:'''(a)''' By using the fact that the density of electrons in bulk silver is <math> n=5.86 \cdot 10^{22} \ \mathrm{electrons/cm^3} </math>,  find the Fermi energy of bulk silver in eV.
Using the current density operator derived in the class


:'''(b)''' Consider the thin film of sliver as a free Fermi gas and demand that the wave function vanishes at the boundaries along the <math> z </math>-axis. Find the difference between the energies of the lowest and highest occupied single-particle states, and compare the difference to the Fermi energy in bulk silver 
<math> \hat{j}(x) = \frac{e}{2m}(|x\rangle \langle x|\hat{p} +\hat{p}|x\rangle \langle x|) </math>  


HINT: In the case of thin metal film <math> L_x=L_y=L_r \gg L_z</math>, the electron motion is confined in the <math> z </math>-direction, which can be simply modeled by requiring that wave function vanishes in the boundaries along the <math> z </math>-axis. At the same time we assume that electrons are free in the <math> xy </math>-plane so that final model to which we apply the Schrodinger equation is that of a thin layer periodically repeated only in the <math> x </math> and <math> y </math> directions. Therefore, to solve '''(b)''' start by showing that  the energy spectrum of a single electron in such thin film is:
find its expectation value <math> j(x) = \mathrm{Tr}[\hat{j}(x) \cdot \hat{\rho}] = \sum_k \langle k|\hat{j}(x) \cdot  \hat{\rho}|k\rangle </math> that can be measured. What is the spatial dependence of <math> j(x) </math>? Note that <math> \hat{p}|k_{1,2} \rangle = \hbar k_{1,2} |k_{1,2}\rangle </math>.


<math> \varepsilon(n_x,n_y,n_z)= \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left[\left(\frac{2\pi}{L_r} \right)^2 (n_x^2 + n_y^2) + \left(\frac{\pi}{L_z}\right)^2 n_z^2 \right] </math>
== Problem 4 ==
The 2DEG in semiconductor heterostructures with structural inversion asymmetry in the growth direction (perpendicular to the plane) plays an essential role in the pursuit of [http://physics.aps.org/articles/v2/50 "spintronics without magnetism"] since the spin of an electron in nanostructures made of such 2DEGs can be controlled by electrical fields (which can be controlled on much smaller spatial and temporal scales than traditional cumbersome magnetic fields). Such control is made possible by the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) which represent manifestations of relativistic quantum effects in solids (enhanced, when compared to corrections in vacuum, by the band structure effects)


where <math> n_x,n_y=\ldots,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,\ldots </math>, while <math> n_z=1,2,\ldots </math>.
One of the important relativistic effects for 2DEGs is the linear-in-momentum [https://www.nature.com/articles/nmat4360 Rashba SOC] encoded by the following effective mass Hamiltonian:


== Problem 4==
<math> \hat{H}  = \frac{\hat{p}_x^2 + \hat{p}_y^2}{2 m^*} + \frac{\alpha}{\hbar} \left( \hat{p}_y \hat{\sigma}_x  - \hat{p}_x  \hat{\sigma}_y  \right), \ (1) </math>


Consider electrons in a toy model of 1D quantum dot modeled on a discrete lattice of 100 points which are spaced by <math> a=0.2 </math> nm. Hard wall boundary conditions are modeling edges of the dot. Write a MATLAB script that constructs the Hamiltonian matrix <math> \mathbf{H} </math> of the dot and the corresponding equilibrium density matrix <math> \rho = f(\mathbf{H} - \mu\mathbf{I}) </math> where <math> f(x) </math> is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function.
where <math> \alpha </math> measures the strength of the Rashba coupling. Here <math> (\hat{p}_x,\hat{p}_y) </math> is the two-dimensional momentum operator and <math> \hat{\boldsymbol{\sigma}} = (\hat{\sigma}_x,\hat{\sigma}_y,\hat{\sigma}_z) </math> is the vector of the Pauli matrices.  


:'''(a)''' Plot the energy eigenvalues of the dot Hamiltonian (in eV) as the function of eigenvalue number. Add horizontal line on this plot for the chemical potential <math> \mu=0.25 </math> eV.  
:'''(a)''' Find the expression for the velocity operator <math> \mathbf{v} </math> in Rashba 2DEG.


:'''(b)''' Using the diagonal elements of the equilibrium density matrix, compute electron density within the dot and make a plot <math> n(x) </math> vs. <math> x </math> at room temperature <math> k_B T =0.025 </math> eV and lower temperature <math> k_B T =0.0025 </math> eV. Explain the difference in <math> n(x) </math> as the temperature is increased (at <math> T=0 </math> K one would get a result, probability density for eigenfunctions in a box with infinite walls, familiar from textbook quantum mechanics).
:'''(b)''' Using your result in '''(a)''', construct the expressions for the [https://wiki.physics.udel.edu/wiki_qttg/images/c/c4/Bond_spin_current.pdf charge current density operator], <math> \hat{\mathbf{j}}(\mathbf{r}) </math>.


:'''(c)''' Add an impurity in the center of the quantum dot (at position <math>x=50</math>), which can be modeled by a large on-site repulsive potential <math> U=2 </math> eV in your Hamiltonian. Recompute the charge density at two different temperatures used in '''(b)'''.
:'''(c)''' Using your result in '''(a)''', construct the expressions for the [https://wiki.physics.udel.edu/wiki_qttg/images/c/c4/Bond_spin_current.pdf spin current density operator], <math> \hat{j}^{S_\beta}_\alpha </math>.

Latest revision as of 12:52, 8 October 2020

Problem 1

Consider electrons in a toy model of 1D nanowire modeled on a discrete lattice of 100 points which are spaced by nm. Hard wall boundary conditions are modeling edges of the wire. Write Python script that constructs the Hamiltonian matrix of the dot and the corresponding equilibrium density matrix where is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function.

(a) Plot the energy eigenvalues of the dot Hamiltonian (in eV) as the function of eigenvalue number. Add horizontal line on this plot for the chemical potential eV.
(b) Using the diagonal elements of the equilibrium density matrix , compute electron density within the dot and make a plot vs. at room temperature eV, as well as at ten times lower temperature eV. Explain the difference in as the temperature is increased (at K one would get a result - probability density for eigenfunctions in an infinite potential well - familiar from textbook quantum mechanics).
(c) Add an impurity in the center of the quantum dot (at position ), which can be modeled by a large on-site repulsive potential eV in your Hamiltonian, as well as two additional impurities at positions positions and . Recompute the charge density at two different temperatures used in (b), while exploring different potentials of two "side" impurities.

Problem 2

The dimensionality of a quantum system can be effectively reduced by confining its particles in certain directions. A two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) is produced in semiconductor heterostructures and is used for the investigation of the quantum Hall effect, creation of semiconductor quantum dots, quantum point contacts, nanowires, etc.

Consider a simplified model of a 2DEG where electron gas (infinite in the x and y directions; you can assume periodic boundary conditions in these directions) is subjected to an external potential for and for .

(a) What is the density of states (DOS) as a function of energy for ? Discuss what happens at low energies and how DOS behaves in the limit of high energies.
(b) Assume and . Up to what temperature can we consider the electrons to be two-dimensional? (HINT: The electrons will behave two-dimensionally if is less then the difference between the ground and first excited energy levels in the confining potential along the -axis.)
(c) In real systems we can only produce a finite potential well. This puts a lower limit on the 2DEG thickness since the ground state must be a bound state in the z direction with a clear energy gap up to the first excited state. If we can produce a potential of meV and reach a temperature of 20 mK, what is the range of thicknesses feasible for the study of such two-dimensional electron gas?

Problem 3

Electrons in an one-dimensional nanowire patterned within 2DEG are found to be in the mixed state, which is 25% plane wave with wave vector and 75% in the plane wave with the wave vector along the -axis. This type of state is described by by the density matrix:

where assuming wire of length with periodic boundary conditions.

Using the current density operator derived in the class

find its expectation value that can be measured. What is the spatial dependence of ? Note that .

Problem 4

The 2DEG in semiconductor heterostructures with structural inversion asymmetry in the growth direction (perpendicular to the plane) plays an essential role in the pursuit of "spintronics without magnetism" since the spin of an electron in nanostructures made of such 2DEGs can be controlled by electrical fields (which can be controlled on much smaller spatial and temporal scales than traditional cumbersome magnetic fields). Such control is made possible by the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) which represent manifestations of relativistic quantum effects in solids (enhanced, when compared to corrections in vacuum, by the band structure effects).

One of the important relativistic effects for 2DEGs is the linear-in-momentum Rashba SOC encoded by the following effective mass Hamiltonian:

where measures the strength of the Rashba coupling. Here is the two-dimensional momentum operator and is the vector of the Pauli matrices.

(a) Find the expression for the velocity operator in Rashba 2DEG.
(b) Using your result in (a), construct the expressions for the charge current density operator, .
(c) Using your result in (a), construct the expressions for the spin current density operator, .